It was eventually published the call for tenders for the award of the municipal sports center of via Montello. Some might say "finally."
In reality there is nothing to be happy, if not the publication itself stessa.vediamo do not square:
1) This notice was published on 14 June 2010, the date of the notice within is reported on 3 May. Because more than a month late? Why make it public when there are only 15 days to maturity (29 / 6) of the competition itself? If you want to make a call to take part in the largest possible number of subjects, is published by a wide margin, so that information reaches all stakeholders in a timely manner, and to ensure that they will "equip" and can make appropriate assessments.
2) When the notice was written there was still the Councillor for Sport Zanette. In the meantime, has resigned. The resignation has to do with this band? Will be released after his resignation, despite having actually written it, since the May 3 was still in office Councillor
3) The notice says that you can also participate in national sports bodies and so on and so forth, but then two lines below is requested that those present should be located in the municipality to capture, and engages in activities to gather from at least two years. This effectively allows you to access the call only to two companies: "Equipe Lombardia" and "Athletics seize" is not permitted to call any associations that may occur in the interim between cogliatesi other historical societies.
4) The municipality pays contributions to who wins the tender, well € 8333.34. We wonder what purpose the municipality must pay the winner! Recall that the sports center is owned by the municipality, we recall that the municipality has "evicted" athletics to make room for future local bar, we also remember that the city has budgeted more than € 60 thousand to make the bar. Now we discover that the municipality provides more money and it is unclear how objective
5) Evaluation of applications. Is there something back in the scores assigned.
Indeed, in point 1, we assess the quality of the subject to a maximum of 30 points, including 5 for the roots, 5 for the management experience and 10 for the experience in the disciplines. The total is 20. and the other 10? Awarded "to minchiam?? To whom should we ask for information? Former councilor who drafted the contract or the current interim commissioner (the mayor)?
6) We talk about the Convention: Article 2 says that the ban may be extended well before the deadline. This extension is not known a priori for many years, but is calculated on a time sufficient to enable the operator to return on investment. We have the absurd that the operator make a bad investment, that does not do: have the right to remain indefinitely, why do not you ever fall on investment! We think it is a wrong clause. Who wins the race should already now what investments will do, and will be judged on the basis of these scores with adequate (hypothetical point 1c of the announcement)
7) Article 6 is missing in our opinion the word "free." If the municipality is organizing an event that is not right "to pay the rent" structure, especially given that Article 15 provides that the cost of the bills are paid 50% of the town
8) Conclusions. We do not seem normal for those who are present for the announcement has the ability to organize sports activities and sports in a structure in which only pay maintenance ordinariac (with the local media data on loan), half of the bills, no investment unless the bar. All these expenses are already paid off with the contribution that the municipality supplies to the announcement.
And then make an example: the young sandalmazi organize summer day at the sports center under the auspices of the town: let's see what would happen if we tried to implement the Convention so as has been proposed.
must request permission at least 30 days before, and that's fine.
fall in 8b, the association is not sports, so they must pay the fee for use, and pay in full, as it does not fall into any particular point. We now know that these guys are organizing events and they pay the costs by selling sandwiches and drinks. Under the new regulation will do it? O as the operator has its own bar that will be the only autirizzato to sell? They can reach an agreement with the operator, like this: I organize and carry you to the people and you turn me part of the receipts?
Specifically what expenditure would have the manager?
A) 50% of the bills for the use he makes himself, as to the events of other organizations / companies, 50% is borne by the municipality, and 50% as a fee for its users.
B) Routine maintenance such as mowing grass, gasoline, etc. ...
C) on the bar and kitchen
D) bills bar and kitchen
E) in return receive money from the municipality, which is about the value of the points AB and C
F) do not forget that as sports club that we believe the only company that will participate in the call could be received (and this year has already done so) grants for maintenance (planting lawn .... etc.)
G) In addition, the operator can earn more money by taking advantage of the opportunity to organize sports courses, events, recreation and social activities (art. 7)
So basically whoever wins the contract, (and there are strong suspicions that already participate in a one company) will not risk anything just from an economic standpoint, but should deal only repay the costs of the bar selling drinks and groceries, because everything else is paid by Pantalone
There's no denying we have a ' Administration tailors have designed a tailor-made contract ....
by the buzz in the country we know that young people did not agree with PDL, we wonder how they will behave now that the announcement is public domain. The share? Approve it?
or believe that we could do better? If you share our opinion assert yourselves, you have the majority and you can decide to change it, remember that you were elected to do the good of the country.
0 comments:
Post a Comment