RUSSIAN AND CHINESE complaint: EXPERIMENTS FOR WEATHER CONDITIONS THE Mirko Molteni
Thursday, February 17, 2005 "Technology is like a pair of magic shoes at the foot of a mechanical doll humanity. After the spring has been charged by commercial interests, people can only dance, whirling wildly to the rhythm ...
that the shoes themselves have established. " These words are effective from the book "War without limits," written by two Chinese air force colonels, Qiao Liang and Wang Xiansui. In the text the two Chinese military will examine the impact of new technologies on strategic thinking on terrorism and on all matters concerning the war in the twenty-first century. Twice they mention the possibility that a country could artificially trigger the forces of nature, using them as "non-traditional weapons" to cripple the enemy. For example disrupting the climate and the conditions of the rains. All this sounds like science fiction, but Qiao and Wang have perhaps the reason of the inclusion of "ecological war" between the 24 forms of conflict they are listed.
invisible threat
Well January 15, 2003, the site of Pravda hosted a disturbing article, authored by Representative Ukrainian Yuri Solomatin, in expressing concern for the experiments conducted by Americans in Alaska, where since 1994 he is bringing forward the HAARP, High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program, that is "active auroral research program with high frequency." In practice, a huge forest of masts erected in the middle of the North American boreal forest. Solomatin Ukraine has sought to draw attention to a problem already raised by the Russians. Those antennas are perhaps the prototype of a weapon "geophysics" American, able to influence the climate of continents with microwave altering the temperature or humidity? The Ukrainian deputy gives credence to the suspicion that natural disasters which have intensified recently are to be attributed to more frequent testing of the HAARP system. Even in Germany, last year's floods have seemed to someone too disastrous. Thus, two German journalists, Grazyna Fosar Bludorf and Franz, they envisioned in their article, published in issue 120 of the bimonthly "Raum und Zeif," that the cyclones and flooding that have folded Europe Central all'HAARP may be attached. Russia had raised the alarm about a year ago. As reported by the Interfax news agency on 8 August 2002, some 90 parliamentarians from the Duma in Moscow had signed an appeal addressed to the UN which called for the banning of these electromagnetic experiment. A month later had risen to 220 Russian deputies in favor of the appeal. On the other hand there was a report accusing the Duma explicitly America. Plain words and awkward: "Under the HAARP program, the U.S. is creating new integral geophysical weapons that may influence the natural elements with high-frequency radio waves. The significance of this qualitative leap from the gun is comparable to the transition from white to arms fire, or from conventional weapons to nuclear ones. " The word
Americans
www.haarp.alaska.edu The official site presents us with an innocent science station where scientists probing radio regions of the upper atmosphere preannuncianti outer space, namely the ionosphere and magnetosphere. The titles of the explanatory paragraphs of the site are also written to mo 'questions ("What is HAARP?," What is involved with the Department of Defense? ", Etc..) In the paragraph titled" HAARP is unique? "We are quick to point out that other nations are studying the ionosphere, the same as Russia or European countries (plus Japan) EISCAT consortium, also if their equipment, site in Tromsoe in Norway, are the radar "incoherent." But let's get the details. At Gakona, about 200 km north-east of the Gulf of Prince William, land owned by the U.S. Department of Defense October 18, 1993 was chosen by officials from the Air Force and from the following year was littered with piles of aluminum 22 meters high, whose number has grown from year to year until you get to 180. Each of these pillars door double crossed dipole antennas, one for the "low band" from 2.8 to 7 megahertz and the other for "high bandwidth" from 7 to 10 megahertz. These antennas are capable of transmitting high-frequency waves to a height of 350km, due to their great power. When fully operational, the plant requires 3.6 megawatts (the capacity of 100 cars), secured by six generators powered by diesel engines by 3600 as many horses each. Official purpose of these facilities is to study the ionosphere to improve telecommunications. As we know, this layer is composed of thin material in the plasma state, that is, charged particles (ions), and has the ability to reflect radio waves toward the ground, especially at night. 'S why, for example, that at night we can hear on the radio AM stations in many foreign countries, since the ionospheric reflection allows signals to bypass the curvature of the earth.
Wars
According to radio waves The same principle is plausible that the HAARP antenna radiation can bounce up to hit the lower atmosphere above a country thousands of miles away. And thus interfere with the weather. Of course these are mere assumptions. However, a military dell'HAARP is recognized by the Federation of American Scientists. Use, however, not destructive, but only reconnaissance. Modulating signals in low frequency, VLF or ELF that is so, it could "see what happens underground, finding bunkers, missile silos and other underground installations of State against. Beyond that, the "ecological war" seems terribly possible for more than twenty years. Already in 1976 the Soviet Military Encyclopedia ventilate the risk that the United States, electromagnetically or by space travel, could change the climate of Eurasia tearing the ozone layer over the USSR. The Soviet Union agreed with the U.S. because it was forbidden the use of environmental climate change. At the UN, this was reaffirmed by the Convention ENMOD (Environmental Medifications), which entered into force October 5, 1978. But a few years later, the United States, the scientist considered the father dell'HAARP openly trying out a system to monitor the weather phenomena. The August 11, 1897 Dr. Bernard Eastlund Patented number of "driving" his 4,686,605 "Method and apparatus for altering a region of the atmosphere, the ionosphere or magnetosphere.
Tesla's ghost is said Eastlund, a physicist at MIT was inspired by the work of the genius Nikola Tesla (1856-1943), Yugoslav scientist who emigrated to America in 1884. At Tesla we found many that made possible the expansion of electricity, especially the three-phase alternating current (while Edison was still perched on the current). He had also attempted to develop a system of energy transmission over the air, which would have rendered unnecessary cables, and a device to get free electricity for all derived from the natural oscillation of the electric field of the Earth. When Tesla died, January 8, 1943, FBI agents hunted all his projects, on which the fabled long. On the other hand the same Tesla had even spoken of death rays, effective up to 320 km away.
do not know exactly what is going on in the projects of Dr. Tesla. Eastlund and nell'HAARP. The fact is that in the nineties Eastlund founded his own company, Eastlund Scientific Enterprise, that among the activities mentioned on its website includes both participation in the HAARP program, as an explicit research into weather modification. What can I say? Returning to the book by Qiao Liang and Wang Xiansui, it is to shudder their sentences: "Using methods that cause earthquakes and changing rainfall, temperature and atmospheric composition, sea level and the characteristics of sunlight will damage the physical environment of the earth or create alternative local ecology. Perhaps, soon, a man-made effect El Nino will become a superweapon in the hands of certain nations and / or non-state organizations. "
As I write these lines, Italy is roasted by a scorching sun, the air is burned by temperatures well above the seasonal average, even ten degrees Celsius.
I saw someone on television who said, with a shocking disregard ...
that the Italian climate has changed: from the Mediterranean has become tropical. This news should to blow up all the seats, but the guy who was speaking was very calm, almost bored, as if reading the train schedule.
I told myself that this could not be normal, I mean: it can not be normal to give (and hear) some news without uneasiness.
We are so devastated that we do not actually make things even more atrocious?
independent scientists (ie those who do not have to support "scientific" ideologies in power) have long known the causes of global warming and the consequent disruption of climate: it is released into the colossal amount of gases such as carbon dioxide, hydrocarbons, nitrogen oxides and carbon monoxide all garbage produced by industries to staggering rate.
If the climate in Italy has become tropical, it did not happen on a whim of nature or a divine warning, but because of the criminal folly of governments (the first of which the U.S.) that place no limits on the poisoning of air, that allow industries to spew tons of harmful gases, which prefer to minimize the risk of global warming and deadly to continue riding on a road that has at its end an impenetrable wall.
Carbon emissions from combustion of fossil fuels (oil stage name) was in 2001, equivalent to 6.5 billion tonnes.
In 1950, the same emissions amounted to 1.6 billion tonnes, the growth rate is - so far - unstoppable and ever faster, the U.S. is the major culprit of global carbon emissions alone will spit in the air 24% of the world total, followed by China with 14%, Russia the third with 6%.
The Bush administration is perhaps the most antiecologica I've ever had in American history, with some people in government the deadly atmosphere triumphal march of death will not stop.
to enrich a tiny percentage of criminals, an entire planet in danger of collapse. And we're not doing, as some says, "environmental terrorism", but we translate words into current studies and the conclusions of many distinguished scientists and independent.
Bush and his cronies are calling holy crusade against the terrorist threat, but how to define the threat that the United States pose to the survival of the planet Earth itself?
Bush invaded Iraq to prevent a bloody dictator would use weapons of mass destruction (which, as many supposed, proved to be non-existent), we get to the point that nations around the world will invade the United States prevent the continued use industries planetary destruction that unfortunately there are poison and the nature of time?
is not an idle fantasy, but what, unfortunately, history teaches us human, that is the story of human stupidity.
Faced with problems of enormous scale, this is the usual behavior:
a) minimize the risk, with statements of experts who ensure compliant and aligned, perhaps with a smile of pity, that the problem is not likely to cause serious concern and, if anything, technology (magic word that has replaced the archaic abracadabra) will tackle and solve any problems of course.
b) continue with no variation, without any doubt, what has been done until now, stubbornly ignoring entries dissent, dissenting opinions, suggestions, alternatives. In the case of energy sources, for example, about a hydrogen engine, wind, geothermal and solar, the chorus has to be (to be recited with vaguely sad tone): "Ah yes, would definitely clean energy, but now they are to be proposed ...." Everyone knows that this claim is false, but must be declared with certainty that peremptory evade any discussion.
c) the arrival of the catastrophe, tears, blaming the "wild nature" blather "climate murderess" or "killer mountain", complain, look for scapegoats among the subject or at least among those who were not at the top decision-making; to fuss for a couple of days TV and newspapers, after which everything goes back exactly as before.
will always be so?
must always be so?
No. But things will change really only following a disaster of gigantic proportions, epochal. If, for example, will continue to lead the planet towards a global drought, will take place migrations, invasions of human masses, struggle no longer motivated by fierce greed of a few elites of occult power, but conflicts between those who have the monstrous violence ' water and those who did not, between those with arable land and those who die in barren deserts or in muddy swamps, between those who want to maintain a lifestyle based on the waste and abuse and those who struggle to survive.
will be a new war since ancient times, a struggle not seen by centuries of barbarian invasions, a universal tragedy and ruthless.
There will be pundits to explain the (unlikely) reasons for a "preventive war" or to pontificate on market trends, geopolitical frameworks, new relationships and balances of power will be the most rudimentary, linear and catastrophic wars, because it will see opposing - by all means - those who defend their prerogatives and those who defend their lives, having nothing else to fight for.
And all this disaster will be caused by the fact that a small minority wants to change his delusional policy choices until it is forced to do so.
And will do only after he ordered his minions in uniform dull to launch the latest bomb.
0 comments:
Post a Comment